<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dr. Ray Pastore&#039;s Instructional Technology Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raypastore.com/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raypastore.com/wordpress</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:28:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Cognitive Load? by sidindih</title>
		<link>http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2011/12/what-is-cognitive-load/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>sidindih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raypastore.com/wordpress/?p=589#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>I found your post to be very valuable since Cognitive Load Theory has implications for instructional design. Reading your post has prompted me to research further on the subject with a view to enhancing my instructional design skills. Instructional designers should strive to design learning materials that have the potential to reduce the cognitive load of learners, thus making the learning process effective. The manner in which learning material is organized and presented plays a part in reducing cognitive load (Chandler &amp; Sweller, 1991), for example appropriate combination of audio and visual techniques.

After going through the literature, I have also noted that while it is important to provide novice learners with instructional guidance in order to reduce possible cognitive overload, this technique can be counter-productive to experienced learners (Artino, 2008). Paas, Renkl and Sweller (2003) suggest that as the level of leaner expertise increases, it is appropriate to decrease instructor control and increase learner control in the learning process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your post to be very valuable since Cognitive Load Theory has implications for instructional design. Reading your post has prompted me to research further on the subject with a view to enhancing my instructional design skills. Instructional designers should strive to design learning materials that have the potential to reduce the cognitive load of learners, thus making the learning process effective. The manner in which learning material is organized and presented plays a part in reducing cognitive load (Chandler &amp; Sweller, 1991), for example appropriate combination of audio and visual techniques.</p>
<p>After going through the literature, I have also noted that while it is important to provide novice learners with instructional guidance in order to reduce possible cognitive overload, this technique can be counter-productive to experienced learners (Artino, 2008). Paas, Renkl and Sweller (2003) suggest that as the level of leaner expertise increases, it is appropriate to decrease instructor control and increase learner control in the learning process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apples June 2010 Announcement by admin</title>
		<link>http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2010/05/apples-june-2010-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raypastore.com/wordpress/?p=241#comment-30</guid>
		<description>well it looks like the iphone is officially not coming to verizon wireless for the time being. most likely in 2012 when the att contract expires. 

announcements:

netflix for iphone - just in time for those limited data plans

imovie for iphone

5mb camera with 5x digital zoom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it looks like the iphone is officially not coming to verizon wireless for the time being. most likely in 2012 when the att contract expires. </p>
<p>announcements:</p>
<p>netflix for iphone &#8211; just in time for those limited data plans</p>
<p>imovie for iphone</p>
<p>5mb camera with 5x digital zoom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apples June 2010 Announcement by admin</title>
		<link>http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2010/05/apples-june-2010-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raypastore.com/wordpress/?p=241#comment-29</guid>
		<description>announcement coming monday.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>announcement coming monday&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Blocks Adobe&#8217;s Flash-to-iPhone Compiler in Latest SDK Agreement by admin</title>
		<link>http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2010/04/apple-blocks-adobes-flash-to-iphone-compiler-in-latest-sdk-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raypastore.com/wordpress/?p=190#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Steve jobs responds:

If that were to happen, theres no lock-in advantage. If, say, a mobile Flash software platform  which encompassed multiple lower-level platforms, running on iPhone, Android, Windows Phone 7, and BlackBerry  were established, that app market would not give people a reason to prefer the iPhone.
....
And, obviously, such a meta-platform would be out of Apples control. Consider a world where some other companys cross-platform toolkit proved wildly popular. Then Apple releases major new features to iPhone OS, and that other companys toolkit is slow to adopt them. At that point, its the other company that controls when third-party apps can make use of these features.
Gruber also believes that these cross platform compilers rarely produce high quality native apps. Steve Jobs reiterated this point in a followup email:

Weve been there before, and intermediate layers between the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the progress of the platform.

Source: http://www.macrumors.com/2010/04/10/steve-jobs-offers-explanation-about-iphone-sdk-changes-restricting-adobe-and-other-cross-compilers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve jobs responds:</p>
<p>If that were to happen, theres no lock-in advantage. If, say, a mobile Flash software platform  which encompassed multiple lower-level platforms, running on iPhone, Android, Windows Phone 7, and BlackBerry  were established, that app market would not give people a reason to prefer the iPhone.<br />
&#8230;.<br />
And, obviously, such a meta-platform would be out of Apples control. Consider a world where some other companys cross-platform toolkit proved wildly popular. Then Apple releases major new features to iPhone OS, and that other companys toolkit is slow to adopt them. At that point, its the other company that controls when third-party apps can make use of these features.<br />
Gruber also believes that these cross platform compilers rarely produce high quality native apps. Steve Jobs reiterated this point in a followup email:</p>
<p>Weve been there before, and intermediate layers between the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the progress of the platform.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2010/04/10/steve-jobs-offers-explanation-about-iphone-sdk-changes-restricting-adobe-and-other-cross-compilers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macrumors.com/2010/04/10/steve-jobs-offers-explanation-about-iphone-sdk-changes-restricting-adobe-and-other-cross-compilers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

